The Collectivizationa and De-collectivization in Rural China
ir power and status through such appointment. So, cadres in rural China don’t represent the benefit of their village members, but the power of the Party as well as the family, there is no possibility for peasants to claim equality or save their from suffering as a peasant.
In a word, after a short flourish in rural China, which came along with the de-collectivization and the implement of Household Responsibility System, most peasants have to face the irrational occupation and distribution system of farmland and the political system, which is impossible to change. Besides there was strict limitation prevent peasants from abandoning their responsible land and rushing into cities, so that the peasants found it is hard to change their situation or turn it more better and free. This may explain why in rural china exists always the tendency of over population but the income of household began to decrease only after less than 10 years from the de-collectivization. As a result, land reform in China has emerged as a difficult issue in rural areas of exchange between social equality and economic efficiency. It seems obvious that since the mid-1980s the wide rural society has been caught in this predicament: where social equality or equity worsened, and at same time economic efficiency held back.. According to statistics, average net income in countryside has been slowed down for years. In 2000, the household average income only reached 272 dollars, but the Gini coefficient in China base in urban and rural areas rose from 0.21 in 1978 to more than 0. 46.
brief conclusion
Looking closely at the institution, an important lesson might be learned. Currently, the goals of equality or equity are still outstandingly important. Thus, an effective reform strategy in China in the current environment must satisfy these norm and then seek efficiency incrementally. Otherwise, it is unlikely that any reform approach or process can succeed. The clarification of land as one of significant property rights has confirmed to be still at an early stage. So far farmers have only insufficient property rights, or we can say that peasants' property rights based of land is still unstable, it is corroded by the current system itself. What’s more, peasants cannot get compensation for their contribution even if they choose to leave or no longer active in their village. Peasants suffer from inevitable low efficiency but they find no way to change the reality. At same time, surplus 《The Collectivizationa and De-collectivization in Rural China(第15页)》
本文链接地址：http://www.oyaya.net/fanwen/view/153161.html
In a word, after a short flourish in rural China, which came along with the de-collectivization and the implement of Household Responsibility System, most peasants have to face the irrational occupation and distribution system of farmland and the political system, which is impossible to change. Besides there was strict limitation prevent peasants from abandoning their responsible land and rushing into cities, so that the peasants found it is hard to change their situation or turn it more better and free. This may explain why in rural china exists always the tendency of over population but the income of household began to decrease only after less than 10 years from the de-collectivization. As a result, land reform in China has emerged as a difficult issue in rural areas of exchange between social equality and economic efficiency. It seems obvious that since the mid-1980s the wide rural society has been caught in this predicament: where social equality or equity worsened, and at same time economic efficiency held back.. According to statistics, average net income in countryside has been slowed down for years. In 2000, the household average income only reached 272 dollars, but the Gini coefficient in China base in urban and rural areas rose from 0.21 in 1978 to more than 0. 46.
brief conclusion
Looking closely at the institution, an important lesson might be learned. Currently, the goals of equality or equity are still outstandingly important. Thus, an effective reform strategy in China in the current environment must satisfy these norm and then seek efficiency incrementally. Otherwise, it is unlikely that any reform approach or process can succeed. The clarification of land as one of significant property rights has confirmed to be still at an early stage. So far farmers have only insufficient property rights, or we can say that peasants' property rights based of land is still unstable, it is corroded by the current system itself. What’s more, peasants cannot get compensation for their contribution even if they choose to leave or no longer active in their village. Peasants suffer from inevitable low efficiency but they find no way to change the reality. At same time, surplus 《The Collectivizationa and De-collectivization in Rural China(第15页)》
★读了本文的人也读了：