英语教材评估标准

7．Are useful ancillary materials such as tapes, workbooks, and visuals provided?

8．Is there sufficient provision made for tests and revision?

9．Does the book use a ‘spiral’ approach, so that items are regularly revised and used again in different contexts?

10．Is the course appropriate for, and liked by, colleagues?

（Score: 2 points for every YES answer. 1 point for every PARTLY answer. 0 for every NO answer.）

Choosing a textbook: questionaire (part III)：

Does the book suit the syllabus and examination?

1．Has the book been recommended or approved by the authorities?

2．Does the book follow the official syllabus in a creative manner?

3．Is the course well-graded, so that it gives well-structured and systematic coverage of the language?

4。If it does more than the syllabus requires, is the result an improvement?

5．Are the activities, contents and methods used in the course well-planned and executed?

6。Has it been prepared specifically for the target examination?

7．Do the course’s methods help the students prepare for the exam?

8．Is there a good balance between what the examination requires, and what the students need?

9。Is there enough examination practice?

10．Does the course contain useful hints on examination technique?

（Score: 2 points for every YES answer. 1 point for every PARTLY answer. 0 for every NO answer.）

Tomlinson’s (1998) 提出的评估好的教学资料标准

l        Materials should achieve impact

l        Materials should help learners to feel ease

l        Materials should help learners to develop confidence

l        What is being taught should be perceived by learners as relevant and    useful

l        Materials should require and facilitate learner self-investment

l        Learners must be ready to acquire the points being taught

l        Materials should expose the learner to language in authentic use

l        The learners’ attention should be drawn to linguistic features of the input